https://youtu.be/Prtux8S7ITw?si=wQMe4UE
I’m wondering why is there a lot glibness in a sophisticated democracy? I’ve met so many individuals who deal with even one thing like this so simplistically! Is it merely your notion that turning from the hips is the best way to do it? Watching the befuddled faces appears to echo that. A easy experiment of turning above the pelvis after which under the pelvis, as proven, would take a look at the veracity of whether or not one feels one thing or feels nothing.
Is not it additionally medical proof that the pelvis/hips are vital joints within the physique? Is not it additionally a mechanical undeniable fact that “fulcrum” functionality differs relying on distance components? Accepting that proof, is not it logical reasoning that tells us the hips can not flip by themselves however must be powered by one thing else?
As a result of your ft are so shut collectively on this case, the hips flip by first turning the waist, which then turns the hips….the reverse order can not work. Within the case of taking a extra intensive, generally a lot bigger step dimension, is not it then the pushing down of the ft producing energy into the legs that flip the hips?
Glib does certainly win superficially. If I needed to guess, it’s simply extra accessible for folks to eschew logic and as properly to be simplistic, aka glib in some clarification, and say, “The hips generate all motion”.